I'm happy to report that the main courses at Maya, although a little dated (hey look, what we ate is mentioned in this old review from Ruth Reichl, who hasn't been the reviewer for the New York Times since 1999, I think) were terrific. I have nothing but good things to say about my dark, mysteriously spicy, chicken mole, and her adobe chicken with warm pico de gallo was actually very tasty and just lively enough. Of course, they could have been served at any time from 1984 to today without nary a change, but one doesn't always need innovation, even from restaurants who claim to be "modern".
Dessert, however, plunged me back into despondency. A mushy, cold tart, filled with tasteless almond (supposedly) cream, lashed with blueberry treacle? (Blueberries? now?). Just awful, inexcusable, glop.
Maybe my judgment of the dessert is a little stilted, I think, because I was and still am in such an awful funk (see first sentence). But then I think back to that pathetic, pale flour color circle, and the bland cream that wasn't even encompassed in the crust, almost sneaking shamefacedly away from a pie no one would want to hang around with. Nope. If anything, the fact that the mole was delicious probably made me better disposed to that awful dessert than I would have been. It was bad.
And yes, as the New York Times says, Maya is expensive. Unlike many places, I cannot tell you why.
No comments:
Post a Comment